Cette émission
nécessite le logiciel gratuit FLASH, voir
au bas de la page pour le télécharger si nécessaire.
La Marche de l'empereur est un film documentaire français réalisé en 2004 par Luc Jacquet et sorti le 26 janvier 2005 (Paris)
Ce film, tourné en Antarctique, traite des Manchots empereurs (Aptenodytes forsteri) et de leur mode de reproduction.
Le film s'inspire d'un documentaire en noir et blanc sur le même sujet, montrant les mêmes grandes lignes de cette migration polaire, qui avait été tourné juste après la guerre par Paul-Émile Victor et son équipe. Ce documentaire précédent n'est pas crédité dans le film.
Fiche technique
Distribution
Des voix ont été données à certains manchots empereurs :
À l'étranger, la narration a souvent été simplifiée et confiée à deux, voire à une seule personne :
Autour du film
Le succès du film aux États-Unis
Sorti aux États-Unis le 24 juin 2005 dans deux salles à New York et deux salles à Los Angeles, le film y bénéficie d'une excellente critique et surtout d'un bouche à oreille remarquable qui le hissent quatre semaines plus tard à la dixième place du box-office américain, avec 700 écrans sur tout le territoire, au plus fort annuel de la saison cinématographique. La bande son a été totalement retravaillée par Warner, le distributeur du film. La musique a été composée par Alex Wurman et la narration, beaucoup plus classique, a été confiée à l'acteur Morgan Freeman.
À la mi-août 2005, le film, distribué par Warner Independent Pictures dans plus de 2 000 salles, se place au septième rang du box-office américain, devenant le deuxième documentaire le plus vu en salles aux États-Unis derrière Fahrenheit 9/11, et avec plus de 37 milllions de dollars de recettes cumulées, le deuxième plus gros succès commercial français, derrière Le Cinquième Élément et devant Le Fabuleux Destin d'Amélie Poulain.
En septembre 2005, il est diffusé dans 2 500 salles dans tout le pays et totalise plus de 70 millions de dollars de recettes, devenant le plus gros succès commercial d'un film français sur le marché américain. Ce succès est d'autant plus notable que l'été 2005 enregistre les plus mauvais résultats depuis 20 ans.
En 2005, dans un article du quotidien américain The New York Times, il est expliqué que la droite protestante conservatrice récupère le film en voulant démontrer que le documentaire défend la famille et ce qu'ils appellent le droit à la vie, autrement dit le refus de l'avortement. "Ce film est la démonstration de la beauté de la vie et du bien-fondé qu'il y a à la protéger", explique un site de lutte contre l'avortement. Le quotidien explique également que "lors d'une conférence organisée par les jeunes républicains, le rédacteur en chef d'un magazine présent dans la salle a encouragé les participants à voir le film parce qu'il défend la famille et fait la promotion de la monogamie". Pour les partisans du créationnisme, le mode de vie des manchots est selon eux trop complexe pour avoir pour origine l'évolution. Cependant, le New York Times précise que "la théorie de Darwin, de même que le réchauffement planétaire, [niés par quelques obédiences protestantes], sont", pour le réalisateur de La Marche de l'empereur, "une évidence.".
Film publicitaire de Canal+
Fin 2005, la chaîne Canal+ a diffusé un spot de publicité, à la télévision et au cinéma, qui met en scène un homme racontant à une collègue La Marche de l'empereur[1]. Comme la jeune femme ne connaît pas le film, elle imagine qu'il s'agit de Napoléon Bonaparte, et le quiproquo va crescendo (elle se représente des dizaines de Napoléon dans la neige, glissant sur le ventre, attaqués par un phoque géant, s'échangeant des œufs, pour s'arrêter aux accouplements). Le décalage comique est renforcé par le ton académique de celui qui raconte, sur fond de 7e symphonie de Beethoven. Ce film publicitaire réalisé par l'agence de publicité BETC Euro RSCG a obtenu le prix "Grand Cristal de la création française" au festival de la publicité de Méribel en décembre 2005.
Récompenses et Nominations
March of the Penguins (French: La Marche de l'Empereur) is a 2005 French nature documentary film. It was directed and co-written by Luc Jacquet, and co-produced by Bonne Pioche and the National Geographic Society. The film depicts the yearly journey of the emperor penguins of Antarctica. In autumn, all the penguins of breeding age (five years old and over) leave the ocean, their normal habitat, to walk inland to their ancestral breeding grounds. There, the penguins participate in a courtship that, if successful, results in the hatching of a chick. For the chick to survive, both parents must make multiple arduous journeys between the ocean and the breeding grounds over the ensuing months.
It took one year for the two isolated cinematographers Laurent Chalet and Jérôme Maison to shoot the film, which was shot around the French scientific base of Dumont d'Urville in Adélie Land.
The film won the 2005 Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature.[2]
Subject matter
The Emperor Penguins use a particular spot as their breeding ground because it is on ice that is solid year round and there is no danger of the ice becoming too soft to support the colony. At the beginning of Antarctic summer, the breeding ground is only a few hundred meters away from the open water where the penguins can feed. However, by the end of summer, the breeding ground is over 100 kilometres (62 mi) away from the nearest open water. In order to reach it, all the penguins of breeding age must traverse this great distance.
The penguins practice serial monogamy within each breeding season. The female lays a single egg, and the co-operation of the parents is needed if the chick is to survive. After the female lays the egg, she transfers it to the feet of the waiting male with a minimal exposure to the elements, as the intense cold will kill the developing embryo. The male tends to the egg when the female returns to the sea, now even farther away, both in order to feed herself and to obtain extra food for feeding her chick when she returns. She has not eaten in two months and by the time she leaves the hatching area, she will have lost a third of her body weight.
For an additional two months, the males huddle together for warmth, and incubate their eggs. They endure temperatures approaching −62 °C (−80 °F), and their only source of water is snow that falls on the breeding ground. When the chicks hatch, the males have only a small meal to feed them, and if the female does not return, they must abandon their chick and return to the sea to feed themselves. By the time they return, they have lost half their weight and have not eaten for four months. The chicks are also at risk from predatory birds such as skuas.[3]
The mother penguins come back and feed their young, while the male penguins go all the way back to sea (70 miles) to feed themselves. This gives the mothers time to feed their young ones and bond with them. Unfortunately, a fierce storm arrives and some of the chicks perish.
The death of a chick is tragic, but it does allow the parents to return to the sea to feed for the rest of the breeding season. When a mother penguin loses its young in a fierce storm, it sometimes attempts to steal another mother's chick. At times, the young are abandoned by one parent, and they must rely on the return of the other parent, who can recognize the chick only from its unique call. Many parents die on the trip, killed by exhaustion or by predators (such as the Leopard Seal), dooming their chicks back at the breeding ground.
The ingenious fight against starvation is a recurring theme throughout the film. In one scene, near-starving chicks are shown taking sustenance out of their father's throat-sacs, 11th-hour nourishment in the form of a milky, protein-rich substance secreted from a sac in the father-penguins' throat sacs to feed their chicks in the event that circumstances require.
The parents must then tend to the chick for an additional four months, shuttling back and forth to the sea in order to provide food for their young. As spring progresses, the trip gets progressively easier as the ice melts and the distance to the sea decreases, until finally the parents can leave the chicks to fend for themselves.
International versions
The style of the film differs considerably between the original French version and some of the international versions.
The original French language release features a first-person narrative as if the story is being told by the penguins themselves. The narration alternates between a female (Romane Bohringer) and a male (Charles Berling) narrator speaking the alternate roles of the female and male penguin, and as the chicks are born their narration is handled by a child actor Jules Sitruk. This style is mimicked in some of the international versions. For example, in the Hungarian version actors Ákos K?szegi, Anna Kubik, and Gábor Morvai provide the voices of the penguins, and the German version as seen in German movie theaters (and in the televised broadcast in April 2007 on channel ProSieben) uses the voices of Andrea Loewig, Thorsten Michaelis and Adrian Kilian for the "dubbed dialog" of the penguins. This style of narration is also used in the Danish DVD version.
In contrast, the English language release has a third-person narrative by a single voice, actor Morgan Freeman. Similarly, the Austrian channel ORF 1 used for their broadcast in April 2007 the alternate version available on the German "Special Edition" DVD which uses a documentary narration voiceover spoken by the German actor Sky Du Mont. Other releases' narrators include the Dutch version, narrated by Belgian comedian Urbanus; the Indian version, narrated in Hindi and English by Indian actor Amitabh Bachchan, is titled Penguins: A Love Story; the Polish version, narrated by Polish actor Marek Kondrat; and the Swedish version, narrated by Swedish actor Gösta Ekman. The Tagalog version is narrated by actress Sharon Cuneta; it is entitled Penguin, Penguin, Paano Ka Ginawa? (English: Penguin, Penguin, How Were You Made?) with the English title as the subtitle. The Tagalog title is similar to that of a Philippine novel and film, Bata, Bata, Paano Ka Ginawa? (English: Child, Child, How Were You Made?)
Another difference between the various international versions involves the music. The original version uses an original experimental soundtrack by electronic music composer Émilie Simon, whereas the English language version replaces it with an instrumental score by Alex Wurman.
Releases and responses
The first screening of the film was at the Sundance Film Festival in the US on 21 January 2005. It was released in France the next week, on 26 January, where it earned a 4-star rating from AlloCiné, and was beaten at the box office only by The Aviator during its opening week.
The original French version was released in Quebec. Subsequently, an English language version was released in the rest of North America on 24 June 2005, drawing praise from most critics who found it both informative and charming. It has received a 95% "fresh" rating on the website Rotten Tomatoes, which collects film reviews. The movie-going public apparently agreed with that assessment, as the film distinguished itself as one of the most successful films of the season on a per-theatre basis: it became the second most successful documentary released in North America, after Fahrenheit 9/11, grossing over $77 million in the United States and Canada (in nominal dollars, from 1982 to the present.) It grossed over $127 million worldwide.[4] It's the only movie from Warner Independent to be rated G by the MPAA.
The film was released on DVD in France on 26 July 2005. The DVD extras address some of the criticisms the film had attracted, most notably by reframing the film as a scientific study and adding facts to what would otherwise have been a family film. This Zone 2 release featured no English audio tracks or subtitles.
An extra on the DVD issue was the controversial 1948 Bugs Bunny cartoon Frigid Hare, in which Bugs visits the South Pole and meets a young penguin fleeing an Eskimo hunter. The cartoon is not frequently seen because of its stereotypical depiction of the Inuit hunter, but it was included here uncut and uncensored.
In November 2006, the film was adapted into a video game by DSI Games for the Nintendo DS and Game Boy Advance platforms. It features Lemmings-like gameplay.
In 2007, a direct-to-DVD parody written and directed by Bob Saget called Farce of the Penguins was released. It is narrated by Samuel L. Jackson and features other stars providing voice-overs for the penguins. Although the film uses footage from actual nature documentaries about penguins, the parody was not allowed to include footage from March of the Penguins itself.[5]
The making of the film
The DVD version includes a 54 minute film entitled Of Penguins and Men made by the film crew Laurent Chalet and Jérôme Mason about the filming of March of the Penguins.[6]
Director and film crew spent more than 13 months at the Dumont d'Urville Station where the Institut polaire français Paul-Émile Victor is based. Although the penguins' meeting place, one of four in Antarctica, was known to be near, the day on which it occurs isn't known so they had to be ready every day. Fortunately the gathering that year was huge - more than 1,200 penguins, compared with the norm of a few hundred.
For cameras to operate at -40° they had to use film and to load all the film for the day, as it was impossible to reload outside. Because of the isolation from any film studios it was necessary to remember each shot to ensure continuity and to make sure that all the necessary sequences were finished.[7]
The main challenge of making the film was the weather with temperatures between -58 and -76°F. At dawn the film crew would spend half an hour putting on six layers of clothes, and on some days they couldn't spend more than three hours outside. They worked in winds with gusts up to 125 miles per hour, "which in some ways is worse than the cold temperatures" according to director Jaquet.[8]
Political and social interpretations
The film attracted some political and social commentary in which the penguins were viewed anthropomorphically as having similarities with, and even lessons for, human society. Michael Medved praised the film for promoting conservative family values by showing the value of stable parenthood.[9] Medved's comments provoked responses by others, including Andrew Sullivan[10], who pointed out that the penguins are not in fact monogamous for more than one year, in reality practicing serial monogamy. Matt Walker of New Scientist pointed out that many emperor penguin "adoptions" of chicks are in fact kidnappings, as well as behaviours observed in other penguin species, such as ill treatment of weak chicks, prostitution, and ostracism of rare albino penguins.[11] "For instance, while it is true that emperor penguins often adopt each other's chicks, they do not always do so in a way the moralisers would approve of."[12] Sullivan and Walker both conclude that trying to use animal behavior as an example for human behavior is a mistake.
The director, Luc Jacquet, has condemned such comparisons between penguins and humans. Asked by the San Diego Union Tribune to comment on the film's use as "a metaphor for family values – the devotion to a mate, devotion to offspring, monogamy, self-denial", Jaquet responded: "I condemn this position. I find it intellectually dishonest to impose this viewpoint on something that's part of nature. It's amusing, but if you take the monogamy argument, from one season to the next, the divorce rate, if you will, is between 80 to 90 percent... the monogamy only lasts for the duration of one reproductive cycle. You have to let penguins be penguins and humans be humans."[13]
Some of the controversy over this may be media driven. Rich Lowry, editor of National Review, reported in the magazine's blog that the BBC "have been harassing me for days over March of the Penguins ... about what, I'm not sure. I think to see if I would say on air that penguins are God's instruments to pull America back from the hell-fire, or something like that. As politely as I could I told her, 'Lady, they're just birds.'"[14]
Another controversy involves those who feel that the Emperor Penguin's behavior can be viewed as an indication of intelligent design, and those who consider it to be an example of evolution by natural selection in action. Steve Jones, professor of genetics at University College London, is quoted as saying, "Supporters of intelligent design think that if they see something they don't understand, it must be God; they fail to recognise that they themselves are part of evolution. It appeals to ignorance, which is why there is a lot of it in American politics at the moment."[15] Author Susan Jacoby claims in her 2008 book, The Age of American Unreason (page 26), that the distributors of the movie deliberately avoided using the word "evolution" in order to avoid backlash from the American religious right, and writes, "As it happens, the emperor penguin is literally a textbook example, cited in college-level biology courses, of evolution by means of natural selection and random mutation. ... The financial wisdom of avoiding any mention of evolution was borne out at the box office ..."
Awards
- Won - Academy Award for Documentary Feature
- Won - American Cinema Editors, Best Edited Documentary: Sabine Emiliani
- Nominated -BAFTA Awards, Best Cinematography: Laurent Chalet, Jérôme Maison
- Best Editing: Sabine Emiliani
- Won - Broadcast Film Critics Association, Best Documentary
- Won - César Awards, Best Sound (Meilleur son): Laurent Quaglio, Gérard Lamps
- Nominated, Best Editing (Meilleur montage): Sabine Emiliani
- Nominated, Best First Work (Meilleur premier film): Luc Jacquet
- Nominated, Best Music Written for a Film (Meilleure musique): Émilie Simon
- Won - National Board of Review, Best Documentary
- Nominated - Online Film Critics Society Awards, Best Documentary
- Nominated - Satellite Awards, Outstanding Documentary DVD
- Nominated, Outstanding Motion Picture, Documentary
- Won - Southeastern Film Critics Association Awards, Best Documentary
- Nominated - Writers Guild of America, Documentary Screenplay Award: Jordan Roberts (narration written by), Luc Jacquet (screenplay/story), Michel Fessler (screenplay)
- Won - Rotten Tomatoes' Golden Tomato Awards - Best Reviewed Documentary of 2005, beating Murderball and Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room
- Won - Victoires de la musique, Original cinema/television soundtrack of 2006
Further reading
Informations
techniques sur le document |
| •Création: 18 avril 2011 |
•Classement: G |
•Durée totale: 28 minutes |
| •Creation: April 18 2011 |
•Rating: G |
•Total duration: 28 minutes |
| •GGTV/Christalfilms |
•Droits d'auteur/Copyrights: Gay Globe Média/Christalfilms |
•Contact/Comments |
Attention: le téléchargement
de l'émission est automatique et peut prendre quelques
secondes ou minutes selon la vitesse de votre connexion Internet.
Si vous ne parvenez pas à voir l'émission malgré
tout, il est possible que votre ordinateur ne soit pas configuré
pour écouter notre format d'émission. Veuillez
donc télécharger le LOGICIEL GRATUIT offert au
bas de cet écran, selon votre système d'opération,
pour voir les émissions de GGTV.
Warning: The video download is
automatic and can take few seconds depending on your Internet
speed. If you still cannot see the video after few minutes
of patience, it is possible that your computer does not have
the required software to view the GGTV productions. Please
download a FREE VERSION of the required software, offered
at the end of this page.
Téléchargement
GRATUIT ici/ FREE download here
|
